little “l”
9 January 2004 For a long time (at least since 1994) I have held that I’m a little-”l” libertarian.
This is confusing for people I know who are self-identified as Republicans; if they
could just get me right on abortion and the war on drugs, they would be OK with me.
It’s also confusing for self-identified Democrats, since we’re only apart on taxes
and gun control, I should be an easy convert.
I support freedom and liberty. Neither major party supports this, so I don’t support
them. The war in Iraq? Making people free, I support it. The post-9/11 “homeland security”
crackdown? Taking away freedom, I don’t support it.
Bush won the election in 2000, either fairly or not. It’s important to me that he
doesn’t win the election in 2004, so I’ll vote for someone that lines up with what
I think is right - probably a big-’l” Libertarian. I refuse to hold my nose and vote; that’s childish. I vote for the person who will most advance liberty, and I hope you will too.
What’s interesting is this is classic liberalism. The term liberal has been co-opted by the reactionary left, much as conservative has been co-opted by the reactionary
right. A pox on both your houses.
