“It did not have enough context for people not working on this issue,
and it was poorly written,” Daniels said. “… It’s about institutional racism, particularly
in an educational setting. There are particular structures and practices in place
that disadvantage other students who are not of the Caucasian or white majority. It’s
really examining our own practices and education, but that wasn’t very clear.”
Another zinger:
But she may have stepped into a second controversy by saying the site also wasn’t
intended “to hold onto unsuccessful concepts such as melting pot or colorblind mentality.”
School district pulls
Web site after examples of racism spark controversy
